The bill will require businesses to take reasonable steps to ensure the sale of such products are not made to children under the age of 13. Suggested actions could include confirming the age of the purchaser before selling and putting up notices besides these products highlighting that they are not intended for anyone under 13 years of age, among other actions. Protecting young people, maintaining the freedom of choice and industrial innovation will turn out to be the deciding factors as AB 2941 works its way through the legislative process.

The post Assembly Bill 2491 – Banning the sale of anti-aging products to children appeared first on Focal Point.

A 2021 study revealed that the detected fluorine levels in cosmetics could be a case of trace amounts derived from materials naturally occurring in the environment or resulting from the manufacturing process. This naturally occurring or unintentional presence of trace materials is recognized by the FDA and they offer guidance on the allowable levels. FDA plans to review such compounds and assures to publish a complete report on PFAs in cosmetics by Dec 29, 2025 as required under the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA).

The post PFAs in cosmetics appeared first on Focal Point.

In addition to the labelling required, the manufacturer or party responsible for the labelling of a product, will be required to participate in a collection study conducted in collaboration with wastewater agencies to understand consumer behaviour. Annual reporting to specified legislative committees and the State Water Resources Control Board under this program is also mandatory.

Please note that enforcement provisions have been established, including a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 per day, up to a maximum of $100,000 per violation, to be imposed on the manufacturer or party responsible for labelling and therefore in violation of the provisions.

To avoid last minute label changes, it will be imperative to act now. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

The post California Assembly Bill No. 818 appeared first on Focal Point.

The state government aims to have this act become effective July 1, 2022. However, it should be noted that this bill has only passed the first reading in the house (on April 13, 2021). Since then, there has been no update. The bill must still undergo Referral to Committee and its Second and Third Readings prior to approval.

Since this bill has only passed the initial reading, there is no action needed as yet. However, once this act becomes effective, your company will be required to update your website if selling cosmetic products in North Carolina.

If you have any questions on this, please do not hesitate to contact us.

The post New Legislation for North Carolina appeared first on Focal Point.

The Cosmetic Fragrance and Flavor Ingredient Right to Know Act of 2020 (CFFIRKA) will be in effect starting Jan. 01, 2022. There are a total of 23 designated lists that contain ingredients of concern. If any of these designated lists are updated, companies will have 6 months to comply from the effective date.

The CSCP Reportable Ingredient List will clearly distinguish between fragrance allergens and other ingredients of concerns, since reporting requirements will be different. Fragrance allergens have unique reporting requirements and will often be determined by its concentration. For example, a rinse-off cosmetic with a fragrance allergen at or above 0.01% (100 ppm) or a leave-on cosmetic with a concentration at or above 0.001% (10 ppm) will need to reported. Any ingredients on the Reportable Ingredient List must be reported regardless of its concentration.

For more information on this and to understand how this may affect your business’ day-to-day activities and future pipeline planning, please contact us.

The post Jan. 01, 2022 – An Important Date for Cosmetics Sold in California appeared first on Focal Point.

The FDA will provide companies with guidance on limitations and warnings needed when certain ingredients are incorporated in a product. Other powers brought forth by this bill includes authority over recall. If a company refuses to conduct a recall, the FDA will have the authority to issue recalls on any product that is likely to cause significant harm. 

Other highlights :

• Registration with the FDA, disclosure of ingredients and attest to safety records 

• Must report adverse events within 15 days and annual reporting of all reported adverse health events

• banning of products that intentionally contain the harmful chemical PFAS (perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances).

• Issuing regulations that will outline GMP for personal care products 

• Flexibility for small businesses 

• Website only business models will be required to provide full labeling including ingredients and warnings

• Authority to seize counterfeit products and seek civil penalties for any violations 

• State safety laws in effect prior to the date of enactment will remain in effect

• To collect user fees from manufacturers to help fund oversight activities

• This bill is being supported by many companies and associations

For more information on this article and to understand how this may affect your business’ day-to-day activities and future pipeline planning, please contact us

The post Senators Introduce Bill – Modernizing the Safety of Personal Care Products appeared first on Focal Point.

Similar to QRA, QRA2 was revised through the input of dermatologists, academics, industry personnel, and stakeholders. QRA2 is a revised methodology for quantitative risk, focusing more on aggregated exposure than its predecessor. By focusing more on aggregated exposure, the exploration of the same fragrance ingredient contained in different products is investigated using databases on real-life product use and habits in a statistical model. This new methodology provides a more realistic look at fragrance ingredients and skin sensitization.

These large changes to the IFRA Code of Practice were necessary for multiple reasons. First, the amendments allowed for harmonization of skin sensitization and systemic toxicity endpoints. Secondly, while the changes maintain the core values of human health and maintaining the environment, the amendments allow the consideration of computation toxicology tests and alternatives to animal testing, wherever possible. Global fragrance manufacturers will need to comply with these changes by February 10 2021, for new products, and by February 10 2022 for pre-existing products. This time frame allows corporations an opportunity to reformulate if necessary. IFRA plans on holding training sessions and webinars for members, to aid in a smooth transition. As well, IFRA will provide a list of service providers who can help with testing and reformulation. For more information on this subject please visit the websites of CosmeticDesign Europe, ecomundo, UL, and the IFRA.

For more information, please contact Focal Point Research Inc. We are leading North American Regulatory and New Product Consultants for Medical Devices, Natural Health Products, OTC Drugs, Cosmetics, and other consumer products regulated by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA

Emily Campbell

The post 49th Amendment to the International Fragrance Association Code of Practice appeared first on Focal Point.

A risk assessment is an integral part of maintaining both the health of Canadians and the environment. Risk assessments are executed by Environment and Climate Change Canada under the CEPA (Canadian Environmental Protection Act) and are used to “determine whether there are risks resulting from exposure of Canadians to the substance or releases of the substance into the environment, and the specific ways Canadians or the environment can be affected”. The assessment of chemicals allows for proper regulatory measures to be taken.

What risks does talc pose to human health?

The assessment mainly focuses on the risks talc poses within self-care products and concludes that it be classified as CEPA toxic. This conclusion is due to two associated risks with loose powder forms of talc. One of the two risks discussed is the inhalation of talc from loose powder products. This risk encompasses products such as baby powder and industrial applications in which talc is airborne. Warning labels have already been required on products like baby powder that are marketed for the use on infants, cautioning to avoid inhalation of the product by the infant. Inhalation of talc can lead to respiratory problems including “coughing, difficulty breathing, decreased lung function and scarring of the lung tissue”. Perhaps more serious of the risks is the possible associations with ovarian cancer. When used on the perineal region in women it was found that it is possible for talc to migrate and find itself lodged in the reproductive system. This judgement comes off the heels of the July verdict of the class action lawsuit of Johnson & Johnson by 22 women who claimed consistent use of J&J Baby Powder on the perineal area had led to their ovarian cancer (due to alleged contamination of talcum powder with asbestos). Johnson & Johnson was found guilty, with the court ruling in favour of those affected. Several studies have also been conducted to observe the possible risks associated with talc, these are included in the documentation provided by CEPA. It is important to note that, in pressed form or consumables (ie. Some cosmetics or foods or drugs), Health Canada did not find talc harmful.

Where does this leave Talc?

The findings show talc as a health threat, but that it presents no threat to the environment. In terms of talc as an ingredient in self-care products; those that are non-airborne, don’t come in contact with the perineal area or are consumed are deemed safe. However, in the meantime, consumers are left to make the decision themselves if they would like to stay away from talc-based products.

Despite these published documents, nothing is set in stone until the final assessment.  A 60-day comment period has opened allowing for comments to be made upon the presented information and conclusions. If passed, the proposed conclusions published by Health Canada would result in the following outcomes as means of risk management:

• Possible modifications to the Cosmetic Ingredients Hotlist to prohibit or restrict talc and its use in cosmetics and perennial products
• Possible modifications to the Natural Health Products Database and associated monographs to reduce the exposure of talc to consumers in NHPs and OTC drugs that have risks of being inhaled or usage associated with the perineal area

Important Dates to Note

• The draft screening assessment was posted online by Health Canada on December 5^th, 2018
• A 60-day comment period has opened and will close on February 6^th, 2019

For more information, please contact Focal Point Research Inc.  We are leading North American Regulatory and New Product Consultants for Medical Devices, Natural Health Products, OTC Drugs, Cosmetics, and other consumer products regulated by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA.

The post Health Canada takes Action on Talc appeared first on Focal Point.

The study was performed by the University of Surrey and involved the irradiation of subjects with whole-body blue light at 450nm, roughly comparable to that of a dose of sunlight. Unlike its cousin ultraviolet (UV) light, blue light is non-carcinogenic and does not share the potential cancer-causing concerns. The results of the study showcased a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure comparable to the effects seen with medication targeted to have similar effects for those with hypertension.

A surprise to the unassuming consumer, blue light’s reputation may see a shift from positive to negative as more and more studies are aimed at finding natural treatments to common physical ailments and shortcomings. A potential solution to those who are difficult to treat with oral pill form solutions for hypertension, this study showcases a potential solution to a common disorder that affects hundreds of thousands of people each year.

For more information, please contact Focal Point Research Inc.  We are leading North American Regulatory and New Product Consultants for Medical Devices, Natural Health Products, OTC Drugs, Cosmetics, and other consumer products regulated by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA.

The post An Unsung Hero: Could Blue Light be the Answer to Hypertension? appeared first on Focal Point.

Cosmetovigilance can be described as the careful post-market surveillance of cosmetic products after they have been made available to consumers.  More simply put it can be defined as monitoring cosmetic safety.  Similarly to the concept of pharmacovigilance associated with drugs, cosmetovigilance employs the principles of post-market monitoring to keep record of adverse reactions to products. Monitoring these unintentional and un-desirable effects is a key aspect of successful marketing of these products.

What is the importance of cosmetovigilance?

Cosmetovigilance is especially important because the safety and clinical trial testing of cosmetic products are under less scrutiny by regulators than other products such as drugs, natural health products and medical devices.  This makes monitoring and reporting observed adverse effects important. There are no forms of pre-market approvals for cosmetic products in the United States or Canada (with the exception of batch certification of certain colour additives in the US), allowing these products to be easily introduced to market. The effectiveness and safety of cosmetics are entirely left to the discretion of the manufacturer, which may include testing, but it is not a requirement. As such, proper incident reporting post-market is of the highest importance. With a proper system in place problems can be identified early and changes made, limiting the size of the population affected.

Where does the responsibility to uphold/enforce cosmetovigilance fall?

The responsibility to ensure that a safe product is being marketed falls upon the manufacturer. They should be aware of risks, if any, associated with their product before releasing it into market place and if needed make consumers aware of these risks.  When it comes to the reporting of adverse effects from the use of a product the responsibility falls both on the manufacturer and the consumer. Throughout the years, cosmetovigilance has proven to be a vital tool for protecting consumers from negative side effects of products.  A common product in Asian countries, skin lightening creams have had an increase in popularity in recent years.  Lighter complexions are seen as true beauty in these regions, leaving consumers willing to do anything to achieve the ideal complexion.  Risky but effective, there are many different products on the market capable of being used to help accomplish this, from creams and gels all the way to injections (considered as illegal drugs). However, some of the raw materials contained in these products can be dangerous and have permanent damage to internal systems. One concerning additive in question in these formulations is mercury. Mercury is banned from cosmetics in nations such as the European Union and other nations such as the US and Canada have strongly enforced concentration limitations.  Despite wide scale bans, mercury is still popping up in formulations and these dangerous products are being smuggled into countries or sold online. The use of these mercury-containing products also does not solely affect the individual using it. Traces of this dangerous substance can easily be passed to unsuspecting bystanders that encounter that individual and even into water supply. In 2016 the FDA stressed the importance that these products stop being used. Without proper post market evaluation, investigation and regulation its possible that many of these products would be remain easily accessible to consumers, contaminating their homes and more importantly their bodies.

What effects can proper cosmetovigilance have on industry?

Keeping track of adverse effects from cosmetics is what can often lead to certain ingredients being restricted or prohibited by regulators. Manufacturers may even choose to pull a product from shelves if an increasingly high number of complaints is received. If consumers are seen to experience sensitising effects from certain ingredients the rules surrounding that ingredient may be amended. In short, without proper cosmetovigilance, vital changes to both product availability and regulation would be less frequent.

For more information, please contact Focal Point Research Inc.  We are leading North American Regulatory and New Product Consultants for Medical Devices, Natural Health Products, OTC Drugs, Cosmetics, and other consumer products regulated by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA.

The post Cosmetovigilance: Safety in Cosmetics appeared first on Focal Point.